Stocks for the Long Run: Owens & Minor vs. the S&P 500

Investing isn't easy. Even Warren Buffett counsels that most investors should invest in a low-cost index like the S&P 500. That way, "you'll be buying into a wonderful industry, which in effect is all of American industry," he says.

But there are, of course, companies whose long-term fortunes differ substantially from the index. In this series, we look at how individual stocks have performed against the broad S&P 500.

Step on up, Owens & Minor (NYSE: OMI  ) .                                   

Owens & Minor shares have slightly underperformed the S&P 500 over the last quarter-century:


Source: S&P Capital IQ.

Since 1987, shares have returned an average of 8.9% a year, compared with 9.7% a year for the S&P (both include dividends). That difference adds up. One thousand dollars invested in the S&P in 1987 would be worth $19,200 today. In Owens & Minor, it'd be worth $15,300. 

Dividends accounted for a lot of those gains. Compounded since 1987, dividends have made up about 60% of Owens & Minor's total returns. For the S&P, dividends account for 39% of total returns.

Now have a look at how Owens & Minor earnings compare with S&P 500 earnings:


Source: S&P Capital IQ.

Pretty good outperformance here. Since 1995, Owens & Minor earnings per share have increased by 12.5% per year, compared with 6% a year for the broader index.

What's that meant for valuations? Owens & Minor has traded for an average of 20 times earnings since 1987 -- below the 24 times earnings of the broader S&P 500.

Through it all, shares have been fairly average performers over the last quarter-century. 

Of course, the important question is whether that will continue. That's where you come in. Our CAPS community currently ranks Owens & Minor with a five-star rating (out of five). Care to disagree? Leave your thoughts in the comment section below, or add Owens & Minor to My Watchlist.

Posted in and tagged with .

Why Open a Browser, get citybizlist in your InBox.